Rights and Responsibilities of Foster Parents in the Courtroom
Judge Douglas F. Johnson, National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Treasurer
 

Summary
A new federal law mandating that foster parents, pre-adoptive parents and kinship caregivers receive notice of hearings and have a right to be heard in proceedings involving a foster child in their care could lead to more informed judges and better outcomes for children.

Article

The Safe and Timely Placement of Foster Children, P.L. 109-239, amended the language of 42 U.S.C. Chapter 675 (5) 2006 to mandate that state courts give foster parents, pre-adoptive parents and relatives providing care for foster children “notice of hearings and a right to be heard” in any proceeding involving a foster child. Each state must enact a court rule or statute to comply with the new federal law. After speaking with judges throughout the country, I learned that a few of our colleagues are quite negative about this new law. Most are pleased. Others do not know what to expect. So, what does the new role of the foster parent mean to judges who hear abuse and neglect cases?

Foster parents offer judges their daily eyes and ears as they provide a home for a foster child. No one else in the system can say that they live with the foster child. The rest of us learn about the foster child second-hand. CASA volunteers come the closest to a foster parent’s insight in terms of regular contact and speaking up for the foster child. But foster parents truly stand in lieu of the biological parent by providing daily care, nurture and love.

Foster parents need ongoing training about their role. Letting go of a child who is being reunited with his or her biological parent may well cause grief and separation anxiety—especially if that foster parent wanted to adopt the child. Concurrent planning for reunification and adoption is necessarily a schizophrenic concept. When reunification is uncertain and questionable, we simultaneously plan for adoption. Prolonged foster care adds to the expectation of the foster-adoptive parent that adoption is likely. How many times have we seen the foster-adoptive parent’s tears when the child is removed and sent back home? Proper training about permanency planning will help prepare the foster-adoptive parent for this type of loss. But we must do more. Grief counseling, therapeutic visitation and transition time must be provided for the well-being of both the foster child and the foster parent.

At any proceeding, a foster parent can tell the judge about how a child is doing in a myriad ways. A foster parent knows what a child likes to eat (or not!), how school is going—both academically and socially—activities in which the child participates, and how the child feels about his parent, himself and the foster placement. A foster parent knows whether a parent is regularly visiting with his or her child. A foster parent knows how a child reacts before and after a visit or when a parent fails to show up for visitation. Foster parents bring children to medical and therapeutic appointments. Foster children experience the stability of mature, caring and consistent parenting from foster parents.

Judges, this new law can help you make better decisions about the best interests of a child who has been placed into foster care because of parental abuse or neglect. Any negative experience regarding foster parents usually boils down to a training issue. Judges can help train foster parents just like they do with all the others who come to court. Can there be a bad apple? Sure, but that can be properly addressed the same as with any other player in court. If a foster parent is sabotaging or undermining reunification efforts, the judge can find that the foster placement is not in the best interests of the child and remove the child. I have had to do this on occasion. I suspect many of you have too. Additionally, Health and Human Services licenses these foster placements and has the duty to provide proper oversight and input. CASA volunteers, guardians ad litem and foster care review board members can also provide oversight and information to help make appropriate decisions regarding out-of-home placement.

It is very helpful to have age-appropriate foster children brought to court so that they can speak to us judges. Some are very articulate and others are not for a variety of reasons. Other important persons advocate and speak up on behalf of the child, including CASA volunteers and guardians ad litem. However, if you want first-hand information regarding how a child fares in his or her daily world of foster care, ask the foster parent. In Nebraska, we are working on an optional checklist form for foster parents to fill out in advance of hearings. It will be offered just as any other evidence. Of course, I will still ask the foster parents for their comments regarding the well-being of a child.

If you still have reservations, try to help shape the process by participating in training, and give feedback as the new law is implemented. One thing is clear, regardless of one’s view, the law of the land is that foster parents, pre-adoptive parents and relatives providing care to foster children have the right to be heard in any proceeding involving a foster child.

Note: Click here to view a PDF of Nebraska Legislative Bill 457 mandating that a caregiver information form is developed and given to foster parents, foster-adopt parents, kinship care providers or guardians.

 

Go Back

 The Judges' Page Newsletter  |  National CASA Home  |  Contact CASA  |  Support CASA


National CASA Association   •   100 W. Harrison St. - North Tower Suite 500
Seattle, WA 98119   •   1 800 628-3233