|
|
|
|
 |
| Where Have All Our Children Gone?
Examining Documentation Standards for International Placement
Felicity Sackville Northcott, PhD, Director, Arthur C.
Helton Institute for the Study of International Social Service,
ISS-USA
Jamie Rae Harvey, ISS-USA Intern MSW Candidate, University of
Maryland at Baltimore School of Social Work
|
Summary
We must amend the current documentation standards and identify
the weaknesses at the intersection of migration and child
welfare in order to understand the extent of the issues
surrounding international placement of children and ultimately
ensure the best interests of all children entering and exiting
the US. |
Article The US Department of
States’ records indicate that international adoptions by
American citizens have increased by more than 140% since 1995.
While data is readily available for the number of foreign
children entering the country, there is little accurate data on
the number of American children exiting the country for
international placement (for adoption, foster care or family
reunification). The discrepancy in data illustrates that current
methods of tracking international placements of American
children are inefficient and also raises questions about the
practical aspects of these placements. Was a comprehensive home
study, including background checks, completed by a
professionally trained social worker? What percentage of
children who have international placement options available to
them were placed outside the US? Do cases involving an
international placement take longer and cost more to resolve?
International Social Service-United States of America Branch,
Inc. (ISS-USA) is one of the few agencies able to provide the
type of international social services necessary to assist in
these cases. However, the lack of data at the local, state and
national levels on the number of American children relocating
overseas for adoption, foster care or family reunification
prevents ISS from accurately quantifying the current situation.
ISS-USA received approximately 300 requests for international
social work services in both 2006 and 2007. From these cases, we
wanted to determine how many involved a request by a US resident
for an international home study and how often American children
were placed abroad. Although ISS-USA, in collaboration with ISS
partnering branches, bureaus and correspondents, collected
detailed information about the requested homes studies, there is
no data available regarding the final outcome of the cases. In
most cases, the services of ISS-USA were not needed beyond the
average 10.5 months of case activity; the cases closed
(internally) before the court reached a resolution.
In 1982, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
implemented the Voluntary Cooperative Information System to
collect cumulative data on children in foster care and special
needs adoptions from state child welfare agencies. However,
intermittent reporting practices produced poor quality data. As
a result, the addendum of section 479 (Title IV-E) to the Social
Security Act required DHHS to establish a national data
collection system. The system proposed, Adoption and Foster Care
Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS), instituted uniform
methodologies and definitions. To ensure consistency,
intercountry adoptions were defined as “those that occur in
another country or those adoptions that are finalized in the US
after the foreign child has been brought into the country for
the purposes of adoption.”1
Unfortunately, the definition fails to include any language
regarding the international adoption of American children.
Without consistently measuring intercountry adoptions of
American children, statistics vary from 300 to 800 annually.2
There is no corresponding data for intercountry placement of
American children.
On December 12, 2007, the assistant secretary of state for
consular affairs formalized the US ratification of the Hague
Convention on Intercountry Adoption. On April 1, 2008, the US
will become a full member. Section 96.43 of the Hague Convention
requires comprehensive data collection on the total number of
intercountry adoptions undertaken by the agency annually in both
convention and non-convention cases.3
Despite the implementation of new legislation, there still is no
consistent method of collecting data on the number of children
who have potential intercountry placements, on whether those
placements are being considered and on whether the child is
actually being placed outside the US. Although ISS-USA is made
aware of and offers assistance in a small percentage of these
cases, ISS-USA does not have the ability or the mandate to
collect national data. Ultimately, there is a need for
legislation requiring consistent collection of data at the
local, state and national levels that provides the following:
- Demographic information on children in the child welfare
system, including country of origin, language(s) spoken,
immigration status, immigration status of primary caregivers
and all options for permanency within and outside the
US
- Measures taken to explore the viability of international
placements and to monitor the placement whether the child is
within or outside the US
- The length of time it takes to achieve permanency—from
removal to placement—and the relative or average cost per case
for international placements
We need to understand the scope of the problem this paucity
of data can cause so that we can make appropriate decisions on
how to best serve children who leave the US for adoption or
other placement. Having this information will help us prepare
the children, assess their well-being and link them with
services in their new country. We must amend the current
documentation standards and identify the weaknesses at the
intersection of migration and child welfare in order to
understand the extent of the issue so that, ultimately, we can
ensure the best interests of all children entering and exiting
the US.
|
References
Council on Accreditation, (2007). Temporary Hague Convention
Accreditation Standards. Retrieved on January 22, 2008, from
http://www.coanet.org/files/HagueStandardsTemp.pdf
Davenport, (2004). Born in America, Adopted Abroad.
Retrieved on January 8, 2008, from
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1027/p11s01-lifp.html
Department of Health and Human Services, (2008). Administration
for Children and Families: Adoption and Foster Care Analysis
and Reporting System; proposed rule.
Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute, (2008). Research:
Adoption Facts. Retrieved on January 15, 2008, from
http://www.adoptioninstitute.org/research/internationaladoption.php
Farrar, S. (2002). Child Trade on Rise, Study Finds. Times
Higher Education Supplement; p. 36, 1/3p.
Hamwi, M. (2006). Sending Babies Abroad. Retrieved on January
15, 2008, from
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_kmnew/is_200611/ai_n16943036
Hendy, M.D. The Hague Convention and the US’s Ratification
Journey. Retrieved January 22, 2008,
http://www.jcics.org/JCICS%20Hague%20Overview%20Article.pdf
Office of the Spokesman, (2007). United States Ratifies the
Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption. Retrieved on
January 22, 2008, from
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2007/dec/97148.htm
Transnational Law Associates, (2006). Intercountry Adoption
Convention moves Toward US Implementation. International Law
Update. Vol. 12, p. 40-40, 1/3p.
Varnis, S.L., (2001). Regulating the Global Adoption of
Children. Society. Vol. 38, Issue 2Endnotes
1Department of Health
and Human Services, (2008). Administration for Children and
Families: Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting
System; proposed rule.
2Hamwi, M. (2006). Sending
Babies Abroad. Retrieved on January 15, 2008 from
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_kmnew/is_200611/ai_n16943036
3Council on Accreditation,
(2007). Temporary Hague Convention Accreditation Standards.
Retrieved on January 22, 2008 from
http://www.coanet.org/files/Hague StandardsTemp.pdf
|
|
Go Back
The
Judges' Page Newsletter |
National CASA Home |
Contact CASA | Support CASA

National CASA Association •
100 W. Harrison St. - North Tower Suite 500
Seattle, WA 98119 • 1 800
628-3233
|
|
 |
|